Righthaven LLC -- a bottom feeding legal outfit -- has teamed up with the Las Vegas Review-Journal and Denver Post to sue mom and pop websites, advocacy and public interest groups and forum board operators for copyright infringement. The strategy of Righthaven is to sue thousands of these website owners, who are primarily unfunded and will be forced to settle out of court.
Righthaven lawsuitsTo date Righthaven has been ordered to pay $323,138 in legal fees and sanctions.Righthaven lawsuits

Showing posts with label MediaNews Group. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MediaNews Group. Show all posts

Friday, November 18, 2011

Former Defendant Brian Hill Releases Video Explaining How Righthaven Operates

Brian Hill explains how Righthaven LLC works and
how they operate as a proxy to avoid liability

By Brian Hill
This video explains how Righthaven works as a legal and liable proxy to protect Stephens Media and it’s cohorts from any legal liability in any case that a judge rules in favor of defendants. The entire video's conclusion is from Sources such as the court documents from David Kerr for my case, The Las Vegas Sun, and other evidence built up in the courts thanks to the Randazza law firm.

See: Brian's blog post in full

Learn more about Brian's case:
Judge Denies Attorney's Fees to Defendant Who Inspired Many Other Victims to Fight Back
Righthaven Drops Suit Against Brian Hill
Lightening Bolts Fired in Brian Hill's Reply; Alleged Fabricated Press Release is Just One
Reporters Without Borders Sends Letter to Dean Singleton, Publisher of the Denver Post

    Friday, September 16, 2011

    LTN: September Has Been a 'Particularly Bad Month' for Righthaven; Group Seems 'Troubled'

    Righthaven's House of Cards
    September has been a particularly bad month for Righthaven. First, MediaNews Group let its contract expire with the company, leaving original investor Stephens Media as the only newspaper partner. MediaNews' new chief executive, John Paton, took a 180-degree turn from his predecessor Singleton in explaining the change, noting via Wired.com that "the idea that you would hire someone on an essentially -- success fee to run around and sue people at will who may or may not have infringed as a way of protecting yourself … does not reflect how news is created and disseminated in the modern world." Not only is he challenging the merits of the suits, he disagrees with the foundation Righthaven is built on.
    See: Related Law Technology News article
    See: Related EFF article (From The Ashes of Righthaven)
    See: Related Wired article (It was a "Dumb Idea")

    Friday, September 9, 2011

    Judge Denies Attorney's Fees to Defendant Who Inspired Many Other Victims to Fight Back

    Earlier today, U.S. District Judge John Kane denied a motion by defendant Brian Hill’s attorneys that Righthaven be required to pay his legal fees. Brian Hill, who suffers from autism and other disabilities, captured the attention of the New York Times, Reporters Without Borders and many other groups and individuals for refusing to cave into Righthaven's intimidation tactics. After the ruling, Brian Hill's attorney David Kerr told VEGAS INC that he was disappointed in the ruling but that he respected it.
    "I think Brian deserves to be recognized for being the first Colorado defendant to really refuse to give into Righthaven’s heavy-handed tactics and stand up and fight. I certainly do think there is a correlation between Brian’s case and the MediaNews Group’s decision not to continue their relationship with Righthaven," Kerr said.
    MediaNews Group, owner of the Denver Post, disclosed this week it’s not renewing its copyright protection contract with Righthaven. The decision came after several public relations debacles, most notably about the Hill case.
    See: Related VEGAS INC article
    See: Judge Kane's ruling in full
    See: Brian Hill's website (uswgo.com)
    See: Brian Hill's Scribd collection

    Thursday, September 8, 2011

    Blogger Ken: MediaNews Group Will Not Renew Contract with Copyright Troll Righthaven

    UPDATE 09/08/11: VEGAS INC has published an important update to the MediaNews Group announcement (See: Denver Post owner not renewing Righthaven contract after PR debacles). The article discusses the numerous PR blunders that likely led MediaNews to its decision, including "headaches" caused by defendants Brian Hill, Dana Eiser, Denise Nichols and Reporters Without Borders. The now broken relationship may have legal implications for 34 open Righthaven cases.

    MediaNews Group Will Not Renew Contract with Righthaven
    The Denver Post is reporting that MediaNews Group, its parent company along with the Salt Lake Tribune, will not be renewing their contract with the controversial drive-by litigation group Righthaven. According to the report MediaNews Group stopped working with them "some time ago."
    --snip--
    MediaNews Group’s relationship with Righthaven dealt almost exclusively with one image that of the TSA agent performing a patdown that became a symbol of the "Don’t touch my junk" movement. This image had gone viral because of the national debate over the enhanced pat-downs and both MediaNews Group and Righthaven thought they had a potential goldmine. They began suing bloggers by the scores including Matt Drudge of the Drudge Report. In the beginning most settled including Drudge until Righthaven made the fatal tactical mistake of suing a mildly autistic blogger from North Carolina.
    See: Related blog post in full

    The news comes just after opponents appealed again to a Colorado judge to end Righthaven lawsuits over Denver Post material. See related news article: Foes seek decisive ruling against Righthaven.

    Thursday, August 11, 2011

    Standing in Colorado Lawsuits Heats Up; Righthaven Accused of Being a 'Liar'

    Righthaven’s Standing to File Copyright Suits Challenged
    “MediaNews Group (owner of the Denver Post) did not transfer any rights (to news content) to Righthaven, and thus Righthaven has no basis to sue for infringement,” their filing said. “It would be bad enough if Righthaven were merely punishing others’ free expression based on rights it actually acquired from MediaNews Group. But, for the truth to come out — that Righthaven filed this suit and many others without receiving any rights from MediaNews — makes this lawsuit mill operation not only abusive, but fraudulent as well.
    “This court must dismiss this lawsuit and treat Righthaven as what it is — a liar,” their filing said.
    Attorneys for defendant Leland Wolf, Randazza Legal Group and Contiguglia/Fazzone P.C., also argued in the filing that Righthaven is hoping that Judge Kane will dismiss its pending cases in Denver without prejudice, giving Righthaven the opportunity to sue again under an amended contract.

    See: Related VEGAS INC article
    See: Reply to Righthaven's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss

    Thursday, June 23, 2011

    Amended Corporate Disclosure Statement Shows Fear and Potential Sham Agreement

    Is the Righthaven-Denver Post Agreement a Sham?

    Righthaven LLC filed an Amended Corporate Disclosure Statement today that shows that the Denver Post (aka MediaNews Group, Inc) had a stake in the litigation brought by Righthaven against persons and website operators who allegedly infringed against the Post. The filing reveals that though not threatened with sanctions by a Colorado judge (yet), Righthaven is afraid that it will be. The document also shows that the "agreement" between Righthaven & Company and MediaNews Group is apt to be very similar to the sham Strategic Alliance Agreement it struck with Stephens Media LLC.

    See: Amended Corporate Disclosure Statement

    Two federal Nevada judges have already determined that the Strategic Alliance Agreement is a sham and have begun dismissing cases governed by it. The countdown clock is ticking Righthaven...

    Monday, June 13, 2011

    VEGAS INC Offers Additional Insights About Lawsuit Filed by Eiser's Legal Team

    Tea Party Group Sues Righthaven, Denver Post Over Copyright Litigation Campaign
    The Denver Post has been sued for the first time by one of the Righthaven copyright lawsuit defendants.
    Attorneys for Dana Eiser, a blogger in Summerville, S.C., and her Tea Party movement group Lowcountry 9/12 sued the Post, its owner MediaNews Group Inc., Righthaven and others Monday in the Court of Common Pleas, a state court in South Carolina. Among other things, the lawsuit alleges barratry, or the improper incitement and prosecution of lawsuits, and unfair trade practices on the part of MediaNews Group and Righthaven.
    See: Article in full

    Journalist Steve Green also points out that this lawsuit is on top of a counterclaim they have already filed against Righthaven in the federal copyright suit.

    Eiser Legal Team Files Complaint Against Righthaven & Company

    20 Defendants Named and Explained

    In Complaint filed Monday, South Carolina-based attorneys representing Dana Eiser and the Lowcountry 9/12 Project allege that Righthaven & Company is engaging in Unfair Trade Practices in South Carolina, as well as: Defamation, Breach of the Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Breach of the Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Accompanied by a Fraudulent Act, Tortious Interference, and Civil Conspiracy. Defendants named in the complaint:
    Righthaven LLC; SI Content Monitor LLC; Net Sortie Systems, LLC; Steve Gibson; Shawn Mangano; Steven Ganim; Anne Pieroni; John Charles Coons; Joseph Chu; Ikenna-Phillip Odunze; Edward Fenno; Fenno Law Firm, LLC; The Denver Post, LLC; MediaNews Group Inc.; Stephens Media LLC; Mark Hinueber; Sherman Frederick; and one or more John Does.
    See: Eiser v. Righthaven LLC Civil - Unfair Trade Practices Complaint

    According to the Complaint, the case seeks to establish that, "Righthaven is a business now operating in South Carolina whose business model— barratry—is barred by state law and constitutes an unfair trade practice. Barratry is a crime in South Carolina and therefore violates the public policy of this state. Because Righthaven’s sole enterprise violates public policy, it is an unfair trade practice."

    The Complaint names and describes each of the defendants (see bottom of this post) then launches into Veil Piercing (Page 6). "Plaintiffs seek to pierce the veil against Righthaven LLC and, by extension, SI Content Monitor LLC and Net Sortie Systems, LLC, and impose personal liability on the owners of those entities. Upon information and belief, these entities are grossly undercapitalized..."

    In the Second Cause of Action, Unfair Trade Practices (Page 11), they point out when and likley why Righthaven began focusing on outside council to prosecute cases instead of using in-house council:
    81. Plaintiffs submit that it is no coincidence that just as Righthaven realized it would almost certainly be barred from attorney’s fee awards due to all of its lawyers being in-house counsel, Righthaven began focusing on outside counsel to prosecute matters.
    82. Upon information and belief, the Fenno Defendants were hired to prosecute the Righthaven v. Eiser mere days or weeks after the filing of the EFF brief.
    83. Upon information and belief, Righthaven has not hired a single in-house attorney since the EFF brief was filed in Righthaven v. DiBiase.
    In the Third Cause of Action, Defamation (Page 16), they cite Steve Gibson's interview with CNN and Fortune Magazine published in January where Gibson refers to Righthaven defendants as "the infringement community" that "was caught ... not obeying the law" and is "a community of thieves":
    102. No privilege attached to the making of the statements. While the statements referenced defendants to a lawsuit (persons Righthaven had “caught”), they were not made in connection with any sort of judicial or legal process, i.e. in open court or in a pleading or settlement demand, etc.
    103. Gibson is at fault for the publication.
    104. The statements involve claims of copyright infringement, breaking the law, and thievery and are therefore actionable irrespective of special harm. 
    In the Fifth Cause of Action, Breach of the Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Accompanied by a Fraudulent Act (Page 20), they call out an interesting Trojan horse allegedly planted by the Denver Post Defendants for the purposes of identifying and tracking persons for prosecution:
    127. The Denver Post Defendants used software to surreptitiously insert a code on material copied and pasted from The Denver Post website.
    128. For example, when an agent of the Lowcountry 9/12 Group copied the Rosen Letter from The Denver Post and pasted it, the following text was inserted automatically
    by The Denver Post’s software: “Read more: Rosen: A letter to the Tea Partyers – The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_16147229#ixzz10NYc7ACn”.
    129. The first portion, i.e. “Read more: Rosen: A letter to the Tea Partyers – The Denver Post,” indicates to a reasonable person that The Denver Post is aware the text has been copied and pasted and simply wishes to insert a link back to the article on The Denver Post’s website.
    130. Not so. In fact, upon information and belief, that text is inserted merely as a Trojan horse. The real reason for the text is so that it can insert the characters appearing after the pound sign, ixzz10NYc7ACn. This is a unique per-customer code generated to allow The Denver Post to associate a particular pasted copy with a specific customer’s IP address for the purpose of identifying defendants for prosecution—and persecution—by Righthaven.
    They later note, "The Denver Post’s software could easily be configured to insert 'Notice: You are violating The Denver Post’s copyright.' Instead, the software tricks unknowing users into believing they have done nothing wrong while simultaneously helping Righthaven sue them later."

    As was stated in a recent email to us, "This is an entirely new lawsuit suit brought against Righthaven in South Carolina state court. WOW!" This Complaint is excellent news for all existing and potential future Righthaven victims. It will take some time, however, to more deeply digest.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

    Defendants Named in Complaint
    1. Defendant Righthaven LLC is a Nevada limited liability company.
    2. Defendant SI Content Monitor LLC is an Arkansas limited liability company. SIContent Monitor is a member of Righthaven and has a direct, pecuniary interest in theoutcome of Righthaven litigation. See Certificate of Interested Parties filed byRighthaven in Righthaven v. Brommell, No. 2:11-cv-724-RLH-RJJ (D.Nev.). SI ContentMonitor is owned by persons associated with the Stephens family, the namesake ofStephens Media LLC.
    3. Defendant Net Sortie Systems, LLC is a Nevada limited liability company. NetSortie Systems, LLC is a member of Righthaven and has a direct, pecuniary interest inthe outcome of Righthaven litigation. Id. Net Sortie Systems, LLC is owned and managedby Defendant Steven Gibson.
    4. Together, Defendants SI Content Monitor LLC and Net Sortie Systems, LLC own100% of Righthaven.
    5. Defendant Steve Gibson is a Nevada resident and attorney. Gibson is the CEO and manager of Righthaven. Gibson has worked on Righthaven v. Eiser.
    6. Defendant Shawn Mangano is a Nevada resident and attorney. Manganofrequently represents Righthaven and has provided notice of intent to seek pro hac vice admission to South Carolina District Court so as to prosecute Righthaven v. Eiser.
    7. Defendant Steven Ganim is a Nevada resident and a Florida attorney. Ganim is anemployee of Righthaven. Ganim has worked on Righthaven v. Eiser.
    8. Defendant Anne Pieroni is a Nevada resident and attorney. Pieroni is a formeremployee of Righthaven. Pieroni has worked on Righthaven v. Eiser.
    9. Defendant John Charles Coons is a Nevada resident and attorney. Coons is aformer employee of Righthaven.
    10. Defendant Joseph Chu is a Nevada resident and attorney. Chu is a formeremployee of Righthaven.
    11. Defendant Ikenna-Phillip Odonze is a Nevada resident and attorney. Odonze is aformer employee of Righthaven. Odonze has worked on Righthaven v. Eiser.
    12. Defendant Edward Fenno is a South Carolina attorney residing in CharlestonCounty. Defendant Fenno is the owner and manager of Defendant Fenno Law Firm, LLC.
    13. Defendant Fenno Law Firm, LLC is a South Carolina limited liability companywhose principle place of business is in Charleston County. Fenno and his firmrepresented Righthaven in Righthaven v. Eiser until withdrawing on May 18, 2011.
    14. Defendant The Denver Post, LLC is a Colorado limited liability company.
    15. Defendant MediaNews Group Inc. is a Colorado for-profit corporation.
    16. Defendants The Denver Post, LLC and MediaNews Group Inc. operate TheDenver Post newspaper in Denver, Colorado and will be referred to as “The Denver PostDefendants.”
    17. Defendant Stephens Media LLC operates the Las Vegas Review-Journalnewspaper in Las Vegas, Nevada.
    18. Defendant Mark Hinueber is a Nevada resident and attorney. Hinueber is VicePresident and General Counsel of Stephens Media LLC.
    19. Defendant Sherman Frederick was at times relevant to this action a CEO andcolumnist for Defendant Stephens Media LLC. Defendant Frederick is no longer CEObut remains employed as a consultant and columnist for Defendant Stephens Media LLC.
    20. One or more John Doe Defendants are included in this action whose identities arenot presently known to Plaintiffs. This category includes but is not necessarily limited topersons directly associated with the Righthaven scheme and persons with management responsibilities over Righthaven associates. Plaintiffs will seek leave to amend the Complaint in this action as the identities of such individuals come to light.
    Attorneys for Plaintiff: Todd Kincannon of The Kincannon Firm, Thad Viers of Coastal Law LLC and Bill Conner of Horger and Connor LLC.

    Tuesday, February 8, 2011

    Righthaven-Singleton Duo Nails David Duke; Rocky Mountain Right Goes Off-Line

    • David Duke, the nation's best-known white supremacist, is being sued by Las Vegas copyright enforcement company Righthaven LLC. | See: Article in full
    • Rocky Mountain Right is temporarliy off-line due to the decision by the Denver Post to partner with RightHaven | See: Website announcement
    • Righthaven goes after website with a registered DMCA agent, Pajamas Media, after posting TSA pat down photograph | See: Article in full

    Thursday, December 9, 2010

    Righthaven Sues Drudge Report Owner, Matt Drudge

    Drudge Report Owner Sued by Righthaven
    Las Vegas copyright enforcement company Righthaven LLC on Wednesday filed its second copyright infringement lawsuit over Denver Post material, this time suing a big target: Drudge Report operator Matt Drudge.
    The suit, filed in U.S. District Court for Nevada, charges a Nov. 18 Denver Post "illustration" called "Transportation Security Administration agents perform enhanced pat-downs" was posted without authorization the same day on the Drudge Report website as well as the drudgereportarchives.com site.
    A court exhibit, however, indicates the illustration is actually a Denver Post photograph of a TSA officer patting down a passenger at Denver International Airport.
    Read: Article in full

    See more on Fox News, The Register, Politico, Colorado Independent, Wired and Westword.


    Still no mention on the HuffingtonPost, whose Wikipedia page compares it to the Drudge Report. The Post has been given a number of "Best Blog" awards. Despite this, bloggers being sued by Righthaven and the threat Righthaven poses to all bloggers has been rejected by the Post as "unimportant." The Post also covers Denver, but remained silent on the recent Denver Post + Righthaven marriage.

    Sunday, December 5, 2010

    Alert: MediaNews Group Signs on with Righthaven Copyright Trolling Scam

    The Righthaven Block List Grows to 178 Newspaper URLS.

    The Las Vegas Sun reports that Righthaven LLC is now doing business with MediaNews Group, whose properties include the Denver Post, the San Bernardino Sun, the San Jose Mercury News, the Detroit News, the Salt Lake Tribune and more.

    Righthaven Now Working with Media News, Sues Over Denver Post Column
    An attorney for Righthaven filed the suit Thursday in federal court in Charleston, S.C. This appears to be the first lawsuit Righthaven has filed in a federal court outside of Nevada, where since March it has filed 179 copyright infringement lawsuits.
    Thursday’s suit would seem to raise the stakes in Righthaven’s litigation campaign as it now involves Media News, which calls itself the nation’s second-largest media company, with major newspaper operations in Colorado, Northern and Southern California, Salt Lake City, El Paso, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Detroit and elsewhere.
    Read: Article in Full

    It was reported in January 2010 that Affiliated Media Inc., the holding company for MediaNews Group Inc. newspapers, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.