Righthaven LLC -- a bottom feeding legal outfit -- has teamed up with the Las Vegas Review-Journal and Denver Post to sue mom and pop websites, advocacy and public interest groups and forum board operators for copyright infringement. The strategy of Righthaven is to sue thousands of these website owners, who are primarily unfunded and will be forced to settle out of court.
Righthaven lawsuitsTo date Righthaven has been ordered to pay $323,138 in legal fees and sanctions.Righthaven lawsuits

Showing posts with label Innocent Infringer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Innocent Infringer. Show all posts

Monday, October 4, 2010

Video: Righthaven Google Search Story 1.0



Who will make version 1.1?

Click here to create your own Google Search Story

Search terms used:

Who is Steve Gibson of Righthaven?
  • Steve Gibson is the CEO of Righthaven LLC, a company "grubstaked" by Stephens Media, who owns the Las Vegas Review-Journal. The objective of Righthaven is to sue thousands of innocent copyright infringers who, unbeknownst to them, are "at times" technically committing copyright infringement by pasting portions of news articles into webpages and blogs. Each infraction is sueable by $75,000.
How many websites has Righthaven sued?
  • Righthavenlawsuits.com is one group that is tracking the number of "shake down" copyright lawsuits that Righthaven files. As of October 4, 2010, 144 lawsuits have been filed with an estimated monetary gain of $140,000 by Righthaven. The website describes the estimation as "based on 35 cases closed as of September 30, 2010 and an educated guesstimate of an average of $4,000 settled per case."
What is a copyright troll?
  • According to Wired.com (borrowing a page from patent trolls), Righthaven acquires the copyrights to newspaper content for the sole purpose of suing blogs and websites that re-post those articles without permission. Typical Righthaven victims include 'Mom and Pop' websites that are cause related, such as, windaction.org. Righthaven's tactics are described as "parasitic bottom feeding."
Who is helping Righthaven defendants?
Avoid a Righthaven lawsuit.
Who is Allegra Wong?
  • Allegra Wong is a poet (See: A Pure Bead). Wong was sued by Righthaven after posting a Review-Journal story to her small website, City Felines Blog, that was written from the point of view of a cat. Wong represents all that is wrong with Righthaven and why this group must be stopped. On September 21, Wong reached a confidential settlement with Righthaven. (See: here and here for more).

Thursday, September 23, 2010

U.S. Supreme Court May Weigh In On "Innocent Infringer" Defense

Who's An 'Innocent Infringer' Of Copyright? Supreme Court May Decide
MediaPost Publications reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has shown interest in deciding when people accused of online copyright infringement can claim they are "innocent infringers" and only subject to small fines, such as $200. The case involves Whitney Harper, who shared 37 songs on a file-sharing network when she was in high school.
Consider the copyright troll Righthaven -- a start-up that has filed more than 100 lawsuits against Web users ranging from Senate candidate Sharron Angle to reform groups to an unemployed woman who blogs about cats. It costs Righthaven $350 to file a lawsuit, so if an innocent infringer defense is available to defendants in those cases, even a victory by Righthaven could cost the company money.
See: Article in full

Related articles:
09/22/10: Supreme Court Apparently Interested In 'Innocent Infringer' RIAA Case
08/20/10: Supreme Court Petitioned to Hear “Innocent Infringer” Case