Righthaven Case Ends in Victory for Fair Use
See: Democratic Underground's motion for summary judgment
See: Stephens Media's consent to the motion
Related articles:
Judge Rules Righthaven Does Not Have Standing to Sue; Threatens Sanctions
Righthaven’s Operating Agreement Revealed by Nevada District Court
Defense: Democratic Underground Fights Back with Help from EFF
San Francisco - In a victory for fair use, the publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, Stephens Media, filed papers yesterday conceding that posting a short excerpt of a news article in an online forum is not copyright infringement. The concession will result in entry of a judgment of non-infringement in a long-running copyright troll case that sparked the dismissal of dozens of baseless lawsuits filed by Righthaven LLC.See: Electronic Frontier Foundation's post in full
The case began when the online political forum Democratic Underground -- represented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Fenwick & West LLP, and attorney Chad Bowers -- was sued by Righthaven for a five-sentence excerpt of a Review-Journal news story that a user posted on the forum with a link back to the newspaper's website. Democratic Underground countersued, asking the court to rule that the excerpt did not infringe copyright and is a fair use of the material, and brought Righthaven-backer Stephens Media into the case.
See: Democratic Underground's motion for summary judgment
See: Stephens Media's consent to the motion
Related articles:
Judge Rules Righthaven Does Not Have Standing to Sue; Threatens Sanctions
Righthaven’s Operating Agreement Revealed by Nevada District Court
Defense: Democratic Underground Fights Back with Help from EFF
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments that persecute Righthaven victims will be deleted.