Colorado Federal Judge Rebukes Righthaven

Judge John L Kane of the Federal Court of the District of Colorado has denied Righthaven's motion to grant a three week extension to respond to Brian Hill's motion to dismiss that was submitted to the court by his attorney David Kerr.

In Judge Kane's denial to extend he issued a scathing rebuke against Righthaven stating his court will not be used as a tool to encourage and exact settlements from defendants who may be intimidated due to the high cost of litigation and potential liabilities. Thus cutting to the heart of Righthaven's business model.

See: Judge Kane's ruling

"the courts are not merely tools for encouraging and exacting settlements from Defendants cowed by the potential costs of litigation and liability."

The very fact that Righthaven requested an extension suggests they are having difficulty answering David Hill's dismissal petition by David Kerr and are stalling for time in hopes of strong arming some kind of settlement which, according to court documents, they are far from getting.

The Judge also stated that after Righthaven responds this case will not proceed further until he rules on the motion to dismiss which is a good sign he will grant the motion.

The Judge appears to have little patience for Righthaven and their business model. This is consistent with Federal Judges in Nevada who have not been kind to Righthaven. Federal Courts do not like being used for profiteering and this ruling is another sign that Righthaven has a lot of trouble ahead in the courts.

See: Related VEGAS INC article